Home » Women and Leadership » Women In Leadership – Myth vs Reality

Women In Leadership – Myth vs Reality

Twitter Feed

Archives

As I take a look across the leadership diversity in my company, I am one of only a handful of women sitting in the top 3 layers of management.  Like most blokey businesses, we have a large number of men, normally of Anglo Saxon appearance.  If I’m talking diversity, we also only have a small proportion of people who are from other minority groups, such as different racial backgrounds etc.  Something to work on if we want to continue to be relevant as a company in the Asian Pacific!

However, lets talk about that issue of women and leadership for a moment.  I know this gets talked about a lot, but I still hear lots of platitudes and myths circulating about why women struggle to make it to the “C-suite” and what businesses can do to get them there.  Here is some data which may help to shed more light on the topic. 

  • Women make up 51% of the population yet the statistics tell us that of ASX200 companies in Australia, women only hold 12.3% of board director positions (EOWA 2012);
  • Women hold only 4.1% of the line manager roles that are considered to be “pipeline positions” to key executive appointments including that of Chief Executive Officer (EOWA 2010);
  • Women’s income is also 24% less than that of men in equivalent roles (ABS 2010) and this widens the higher in the organisation you go (EOWA 2010).    A 2009 KPMG report for the Diversity Council of Australia found that a large component of the wage gap could be attributed to sex discrimination.  (This is despite women being more likely than their male counterparts to have post graduate qualifications);
  • According to Goldman Sachs, narrowing the gap between male and female employment participation rates would boost GDP by 11% (Australia is ranked 50th in the world internationally in regard to women’s labour force participation relative to men’s); If the gender productivity gap was minimised (eg by increasing the number of women in leadership roles), the level of economic activity in Australia could be boosted by 20% (www.hreoc.gov.au);
  • Research says that women have a narrower range of behaviours available to them and they need to navigate them carefully.  They need to present themselves as BOTH a credible manager AND sufficiently feminine not to challenge societal assumptions about gender (Sealy and Singh, 2010);
  • Women are over mentored and under sponsored (Singh et al 2003);
  • Both men and women have stereotypes about managers as male, “think manager, think male” (Shein, 2001).  The prevailing image of the promotable person is one who is rational, competitive, strong, decisive, self-confident and independent (Fagenson, 1990), which is biased toward male stereotyping.

In a 2007 article in the Harvard Business Review, researchers described a woman’s progress to the top using the metaphor of the career labyrinth.   Passage through the labyrinth is possible, but it requires persistence, awareness of one’s progress, and a careful analysis of the puzzles that lie ahead.   A woman’s progress may be stalled by prejudices against women, issues of leadership style and authenticity, and stereotypes about family responsibilities. (Eagly, Alice H.; Carli, Linda L.. Harvard Business Review, Sep2007, Vol. 85 Issue 9, p63-71).  The career labyrinth is a metaphor I can identify with based on my own experiences.

The business case for being able to access up to 50% of the possible employment market, and to maximise the full potential of the people who are working for you, is compelling.  So, if you are really serious about improving your gender equity stats, then here are a few suggestions to get you started:

  • Bring gender equity to the Executive table and ensure someone (preferably a male) is Executive sponsor.  Support this with an annual gender equity plan (with measures) and an annual gender equity pay analysis;
  • Acquaint yourself with the resources and case studies available at the Workplace Gender Equality Agency http://www.wgea.gov.au/;
  • Train your management team in how to make objective selection, promotion and pay decisions; and
  • Stop stereotyping “flexible work practices” as a solution for women.  Flexible work practices need to be available to both men and women such that each family can come up with the solutions that best suit them as a unit.

Its time to stop talking about this issue and for your business – and mine – to start acting.  More importantly, lets each ensure that talk and action leads to results.

Thanks to Dr Linley Lord, Maureen Bickley Centre for Women in Leadership, Curtin Graduate School of Business for providing assistance with the research contained in this blog.


4 Comments

  1. Fiona Cahill says:

    I fully agree with your comment that flexible work arrangements need to be available (and encouraged) for both men and women. If we consider the situation when mothers return to work and their children are ill. It is almost always the case that the mothers are expected to take time off work, to care for the child. Only rarely do the parents share this role. I suspect that men find it harder to explain to their employer that they need time off for this purpose. In my view, we should also reconsider our expectations of men.

    • vmiltrup says:

      Absolutely. I do find that there is a basic assumption that women dont make it to leadership roles because of their parenting responsibilities. I think that is overly simplistic and stereotypical of the modern family structure. My personal experience has been that Jason and I have both taken on the carer role at different times, including periods where Jason has been the stay at home partner.

  2. Virginia – I totally agree about the narrower range of behaviours. As women in leadership roles, or pursuing leadership roles, you continually have to toe the fine line between firm and friendly, but not too either way otherwise you are labelled as a bitch or as a flirt. This shouldn’t be an issue in this day and age, but unfortunately it is.

    Also, I do find that a lot of negativity I’ve experienced in the past has come from other women. I think increased support from or between women within industries, organisations, and so forth would help to improve the overall positioning of women in business. We should work together rather than against each other. I have observed that this mentality is changing, which is great, but this is an area where companies could potentially encourage collaborative or Mastermind groups.

    • vmiltrup says:

      Hi Janine. I agree that women can sometimes work against or inspite of each other, which is not helpful.

      I am noticing more women’s leadership groups being formed which should help to address this. For example, at the CBH Group we have formed “Demeter Circle” to promote women’s leadership within our organisation and I know of many other companies doing the same.

      One thing men do well is sponsor (promote) each other for opportunities through their networks. If we are to see more women in leadership roles, we will need both men and women to sponsor more up and coming women for senior roles. Virginia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: